Archive for January, 2009

Keys To Obama Victory

Friday, January 16th, 2009

From Marc Ambinder:
“In the language of entertainment awards, these folks were the best supporting actors.

If you read this blog regularly, you’ve heard of Catalist, the data warehousing company, the National Committee for an Effective Congress, a longtime Democratic targeting firm, Project New West, which works in the West, and the Analyst Institute, which conducted randomized control trials for these groups.

They’re the spine of the party, working on the back end, segregating data, segregating demographic groups and providing statistically valid data to election planners. In 2004, Republicans’ targeting accuracy contributed to President Bush’s victory.

The data released today show that Democrats have clearly caught up.”

More Here

Bush’s Closing Argument: Was Anybody Listening?

Friday, January 16th, 2009

“President George W. Bush said farewell to the nation, but the nation wasn’t paying attention. TV barely cut to him in time for his first words Thursday evening and couldn’t wait to cut away when he finished 13 minutes later. Something unexpected and awesome had happened to shoulder him out of the picture: a jet gliding to a stop in the middle of the Hudson River, with everyone emerging safe. The departure of President Bush, by contrast, had become part of the world’s mental wallpaper some time ago.”

Full Article Here

[Video]:


When Bush Is History

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post writes:

“Asked to identify the biggest mistake of his presidency, Bush gave a curious answer that had more to do with public relations than presidential decision making. He mentioned the “Mission Accomplished” banner that prematurely announced the end of major conflict in Iraq — but not his decision to invade Iraq in the first place. He mentioned his failure to visit New Orleans at the height of the devastating, deadly flooding caused by Hurricane Katrina — but not the decision to entrust the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the hapless and ineffective Michael Brown.”

“That there has been no new attack does not justify waterboarding, Guantanamo, secret CIA prisons or warrantless domestic surveillance. Bush believes these departures from American values and traditions were necessary, but from what we know so far, they look more like overkill — an excess of cruelty and a disdain for the rule of law that have seriously damaged this nation’s sense of itself. “

Read More Here

Perle Washes His Hands Of Iraq: I Was Not An ‘Architect Of That War,’ Neocons Had No Influence

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

From ThinkProgress:

Over the past few weeks, many Bush administration officials have begun rewriting history in an effort to burnish President Bush’s legacy. Following suit, neoconservative war hawk Richard Perle has taken the opportunity to polish his own record during the Bush years — mainly on Iraq.

In the latest issue of The National Interest, Perle devotes 4,600 words — not to congratulate President Bush for invading Iraq — but to wipe his, and the whole neoconservative movement’s, hands clean of the whole affair. In the essay, he categorically denies that both he — and neoconservative ideology in general — had any influence on the Bush administration in its decision to go to war

Indeed, no matter how many incoherent, contradictory and misleading essays Perle concocts trying to absolve himself from the Iraq debacle, like his fellow Iraq war architects, it’s clear he has no leg to stand on.

Read More Here

Obama On Challenges

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

President-Elect Barack Obama sat down with John Harwood of CNBC and discussed topics ranging from Obama’s recovery plan to the BCS Bowl system.


See More Interview Segments Here

In Reversal, Fed Now Won’t Release Key Doc On Asset-Buying Program

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

From Talking Points Memo:
“As we told you last week, the Fed has initiated a program to purchase half a trillion dollars worth of mortgage debt that is purportedly clogging up the credit markets. This is essentially what the TARP program was initially supposed to do — buy back mortgage securities. But they decided not to. And now the Fed is doing something similar, though there are important differences.

They’ve contracted with four financial services firms to manage the money. Under normal circumstances the fees generated by managing that much money could be huge.

Equally important, having these firms manage this money creates huge potential conflicts of interest and opportunities for self-dealing. Just to explain this in the most general terms, the companies holding these securities are sitting on assets worth only a fraction of their presumed value as recently as six months ago. The companies now managing the buy-back are in many cases the same outfits that helped saddle these companies up with these crappy investments in the first place. And they’re the companies likely to be doing business with these companies again once this TARP thing is over. So the managers have all sorts of incentive to make these companies whole as opposed to driving a good bargain for taxpayers.

All of which makes it really important that we know how these four companies were chosen, how they’re being paid and just how the decision-making is taking place.”

Read More Here

Obama Invited to Meeting with Ex-Presidents

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

Obama To Give Economic Speech Thursday

Monday, January 5th, 2009

From CBS.com:
“President-elect Barack Obama plans to give a major economic speech Thursday, an Obama spokesman confirms for CBSNews.com. No other details are available at this time.

Obama will meet with his economic team at the transition office in Washington, D.C. at 12:15pm today. He will also talk stimulus with Democratic and Republican leaders on Capitol Hill today.”

Political Hotsheet